An Indiana grain farmer will take on global seed giant?Monsanto?Co at the U.S. Supreme Court?next week in a patent battle that could have ramifications for the?biotechnology industry and the future of food production.
EnlargeA 75-year-old?Indiana grain farmer will take on global seed giant?Monsanto?Co at the U.S. Supreme Court?next week in a patent battle that could have ramifications for the?biotechnology industry and possibly the future of food production.
Skip to next paragraph' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The highest court in the?United States will hear arguments on Tuesday in the dispute, which started when soybean farmer?Vernon Bowman bought and planted a mix of unmarked grain typically used for animal feed. The plants that grew turned out to contain the popular herbicide-resistant genetic trait known as Roundup Ready that?Monsanto?guards closely with patents.
The?St. Louis, Mo.-based biotech giant accused Bowman of infringing its patents by growing plants that contained its genetics. But Bowman, who grows wheat and corn along with soybeans on about 300 acres inherited from his father, argued that he used second-generation grain and not the original seeds covered by?Monsanto's patents.
IN PICTURES:?From Field to Fork: The foreign and domestic food chain
A central issue for the court is the extent that a patent holder, or the developer of a genetically modified seed, can control its use through multiple generations of seed.
The Supreme Court's decision to hear the dispute has sparked broad concerns in the biotech industry as a range of companies fear it will result in limits placed on their own patents of?self-replicating technologies.
At the same time, many farmer groups and biotech crop critics hope the Supreme Court might curb what they say is a patent system that gives too much power to biotech seed companies like?Monsanto.
"I think the case has enormous implications," said Dermot Hayes, an?Iowa State University agribusiness and economics professor who believes?Monsanto?should prevail. "If?Monsanto?were to lose, many companies would have a reduced incentive for research in an area where we really need it right now. The world needs more food."
The court battle has ballooned into a show-down that merges contentious matters of patent law with an ongoing national debate about the merits and pitfalls of genetically altered crops and efforts to increase food production.
More than 50 organizations - from environmental groups to intellectual property experts - as well as the U.S. government have filed legal briefs hoping to sway the high court.
Companies developing patented cell lines and tools of molecular?biotechnology?could lose their ability to capture the ongoing value of these technologies if the Supreme Court sides with Bowman, said Hans Sauer, deputy general counsel for the?Biotechnology Industry Organization.
gavin degraw gavin degraw alec time 100 bob beckel anna paquin warren buffett
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.